![]() Those familiar with the evidence would say no. It certainly has the resources: around a thousand employees, including research scientists, links to major universities - and I’m sure the museum would not refuse outside help. You would think if anyone could copy the Shroud, the British Museum could. He said if the museum accepted the challenge, he would place a million dollars in a legal holding account pending the outcome. Rolfe’s challenge might have seemed like a stunt, but it was serious. And if you can, there’s a one-million-dollar donation for your funds.’” The Museum oversaw the carbon tests on the Shroud and Rolfe explained: “They said it was knocked up by a medieval conman, and I say: ‘Well, if he could do it, you must be able to do it as well. ![]() Only days before the new dating results were announced, one of the main players in the drama, British filmmaker David Rolfe, issued a million-dollar challenge to the British Museum to replicate the Shroud. Experimentĭebate about the Shroud has been going on for centuries, provoking heated exchanges, revealing a tortuous trail of evidence full of unexpected twists and turns, and prompting more unanswerable questions than any other artefact in history. In addition, an immense body of other evidence suggests the cloth, which appears to carry an image of Jesus’s crucified body, is genuine. ![]() Some people would have been surprised, but not anyone who had been following the build-up of evidence indicating the Shroud is authentic.Ī total of four tests have now dated the Shroud to the first century. ![]() This dating contradicted a 1980s carbon dating that suggested the Shroud was from the Middle Ages. In April 2022 new tests on the Shroud of Turin - believed by many to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ - dated it to the first century. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |